North Korea & Iran: A Decades-Long Alliance Under Scrutiny

Roxane Gerhold DVM 22 Jun 2025

The geopolitical landscape is constantly shifting, but some alliances, forged in shared adversity, endure for decades. Among the most intriguing and concerning of these is the complex relationship between North Korea and Iran. Both nations, often viewed as pariah states by Western powers, have cultivated a strategic partnership that has significant implications for global security. From clandestine arms deals to shared opposition to the United States and its allies, the intricate web of North Korea-Iran relations warrants close examination.

This article delves into the historical roots, evolving dynamics, and future trajectory of this critical alliance. We will explore how these two nations, despite their stark ideological differences, have found common ground in their defiance of international norms and their pursuit of strategic objectives, often raising alarms in Washington, Brussels, and beyond. Understanding their bond is crucial for comprehending the broader challenges to peace and stability in the Middle East and East Asia.

The Enduring Bond: A Strategic Partnership Unveiled
- Roots of Cooperation: From Diplomacy to Arms Transfers
A Shared Adversarial Stance Against the West
Nuclear Ambitions and Proliferation Concerns
- The Looming Threat: Fissile Material and Global Alarms
Military Cooperation: Weapons, Drones, and Beyond
- Echoes of Conflict: Arms Sales and Regional Instability
Economic Dynamics and Geopolitical Realities
Recent Developments and International Scrutiny
- Diplomatic Engagements and Heightened Vigilance
The Paradoxical Alliance: Opposites Yet Aligned
Future Trajectories: What Lies Ahead for Pyongyang and Tehran?

The Enduring Bond: A Strategic Partnership Unveiled

Ever since establishing diplomatic ties in 1973, North Korea and Iran have cooperated, laying the groundwork for a strategic partnership that has evolved over decades. This relationship is not merely a matter of convenience but a deep-seated alignment rooted in shared geopolitical interests and a common adversary: Western powers and their regional allies. Both Pyongyang and Tehran have consistently found themselves at odds with the United States, Europe, Israel, and key Asian allies like South Korea and Japan. This mutual opposition has served as a powerful glue, fostering a bond that transcends geographical distance and ideological differences.

The longevity of this relationship underscores its strategic importance to both sides. While the specific nature of their cooperation has shifted over time, the underlying principle of mutual support in the face of external pressure has remained constant. This enduring bond is particularly noteworthy, given the secretive nature of both regimes and the international sanctions they face. It suggests a level of trust and strategic foresight that has allowed them to navigate complex global dynamics and continue their collaboration, often out of the public eye.

Roots of Cooperation: From Diplomacy to Arms Transfers

The foundation of North Korea-Iran relations was laid with the establishment of diplomatic ties in 1973. However, it was during the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) that their cooperation truly began to flourish, with a particularly noteworthy period being North Korea’s arms transfers to Iran. Facing an international arms embargo, Iran desperately needed military hardware, and North Korea, a willing and capable supplier, stepped in to fill the void. This period cemented North Korea’s role as a crucial provider of military technology and expertise to Iran.

One telling incident highlighting the clandestine nature of this relationship occurred in 1982 when the North Korean authorities secretly invited an Iraqi delegation. This seemingly contradictory move underscores Pyongyang's pragmatic approach to arms sales, engaging with both sides of a conflict if it served their economic and strategic interests. However, the consistent and significant flow of arms to Iran during its protracted war with Iraq raised concerns that arms sales from Pyongyang and Tehran have helped fuel conflicts in the Middle East, a pattern that has continued to reverberate through the region. This historical precedent established a pattern of military-technical cooperation that would define much of their subsequent relationship, particularly in the realm of missile and unconventional weapons development.

A Shared Adversarial Stance Against the West

The strategic partnership between North Korea and Iran is perhaps best understood through their shared adversarial stance against Western powers. Both nations have been designated as 'state sponsors of terrorism' by the United States, a label that underscores Washington's deep concerns about their activities. Furthermore, both were famously labeled as part of the “axis of evil” by former U.S. President George W. Bush, a rhetorical grouping that highlighted their perceived threat to international security and their pursuit of weapons of mass destruction. This shared designation, while controversial, solidified their image in the West as dangerous renegade states.

This alignment in opposition to the West provides a powerful impetus for their cooperation. Iran is a longstanding adversary of Israel and the Arab states of the Persian Gulf, while North Korea poses a significant conventional military and unconventional weapons threat to major U.S. allies in Asia, including South Korea and Japan. Their respective geopolitical positions, though geographically distant, are linked by a common desire to challenge the existing U.S.-led global order. This convergence of interests means that despite their vastly different internal systems—one an Islamic Republic, the other an irreligious state that worships Kim family rule—they find common ground in their external policies. For more than four decades, Pyongyang and Tehran have leveraged this shared antagonism to foster a robust, if often covert, partnership.

Nuclear Ambitions and Proliferation Concerns

North Korea and Iran have recently made headlines due to their nuclear aspirations and strengthening bilateral relations, drawing intense scrutiny from the international community. Both nations have pursued nuclear programs under the veil of secrecy and defiance, raising profound concerns about proliferation. While Iran’s leadership insists that its nuclear program is for peaceful energy purposes, the international community started to raise concerns that it might become the “next North Korea,” given the parallels in their clandestine activities and their resistance to full transparency.

The parallels are indeed striking. North Korea has already demonstrated its nuclear capabilities through multiple tests, and Iran’s progress in enriching uranium has brought it dangerously close to a similar threshold. As of now, reports indicate that Iran has enough fissile material to fuel at least five nuclear weapons, a stark figure that amplifies global anxieties. The potential for these two nations, both already under heavy sanctions and international pressure, to further develop and potentially share nuclear technologies represents a grave threat to global stability. The implications of such a scenario are truly "Your Money or Your Life" critical, affecting international security, economic stability, and the very fabric of non-proliferation efforts.

The Looming Threat: Fissile Material and Global Alarms

The possession of significant quantities of fissile material by Iran is a critical point of concern. The ability to quickly assemble nuclear weapons, often referred to as "breakout capability," is a red line for many international actors. This capability, coupled with Iran’s advanced missile program—which has historically benefited from North Korean expertise—creates a potent and alarming combination. Wikileaks’ cables on North Korea’s missile sales to Iran have raised new concerns about the country’s proliferation activities, explicitly linking Pyongyang's capabilities to Tehran's ambitions.

Expert Jeffrey Lewis, a prominent non-proliferation specialist, has highlighted Pyongyang’s procurement networks as a key element in its ability to transfer sensitive technologies. These networks are sophisticated and often operate under the radar, making it incredibly difficult for international bodies to track and intercept illicit transfers. The concern is not just about direct nuclear material transfer, but also about the sharing of design knowledge, engineering expertise, and the components necessary for building a nuclear device or the missiles to deliver them. The ongoing development of these capabilities by both nations continues to be a focal point of international diplomacy and intelligence efforts, aiming to prevent a dangerous escalation in the Middle East and beyond.

Military Cooperation: Weapons, Drones, and Beyond

The military dimension of North Korea-Iran relations is arguably the most critical aspect of their strategic partnership. Both nations are known for their robust military industries and their willingness to engage in arms transfers, often in defiance of international sanctions. This cooperation has raised concerns that arms sales from Pyongyang and Tehran have helped fuel conflicts in the Middle East and other volatile regions. The exchange of military technology, expertise, and even finished products has been a consistent feature of their relationship.

A contemporary example of this military synergy is Iran's alleged provision of drones to Russia for use in the war against Ukraine. While Iran has dismissed reports that it intends to obtain advanced military technology from North Korea as fake news, the very existence of such reports underscores the international community's vigilance regarding their potential for deeper military collaboration. The United States and the European Union say they are keeping their eyes on Pyongyang and Tehran for any possible military cooperation between the two, particularly as Iran confirms a North Korean delegation's recent visit. This constant monitoring reflects the serious implications of any further military-technological exchanges between these two heavily sanctioned states.

Echoes of Conflict: Arms Sales and Regional Instability

The historical record is replete with instances where North Korean arms have appeared in conflict zones, often supplied to states or non-state actors aligned with Iran’s regional interests. This pattern of arms sales from Pyongyang and Tehran has helped fuel conflicts in the Middle East, contributing to instability and prolonging hostilities. From ballistic missiles to conventional weaponry, North Korea has long been a key supplier to Iran, particularly during times when other avenues were closed off due to sanctions.

The proliferation of advanced military technology, including missile components and drone capabilities, from either nation to the other, or to their proxies, significantly complicates regional security dynamics. It empowers actors who might otherwise lack the means to project power or sustain conflicts, thereby exacerbating humanitarian crises and undermining peace efforts. The international community's concern is not just about the direct military capabilities of North Korea and Iran, but also their role as proliferators who enable other dangerous actors, making their military cooperation a constant source of global anxiety.

Economic Dynamics and Geopolitical Realities

While the strategic and military aspects of North Korea-Iran relations are paramount, the economic dimensions also play a role, albeit a complex one. For China, a major global power with significant interests in the Middle East, economic relations with Iran are less important than those with the Gulf states that are Iran’s adversaries. This highlights a crucial geopolitical reality: while North Korea and Iran may be aligned in their opposition to the West, their individual relationships with other global players like China can differ significantly. China's pragmatic approach prioritizes its broader economic and energy security needs, which often involve balancing relationships with all regional actors.

Interestingly, the dynamic of alliances and their economic benefits appears to be uneven. North Korea reaps major rewards from its alliance with Russia, particularly in the context of the war in Ukraine, reportedly sending troops and missiles in exchange for various forms of assistance. In contrast, Iran sees little in return despite aiding Moscow’s war effort in Ukraine with drone support to Russia. This disparity suggests that while both North Korea and Iran are aligned in their anti-Western stance and their support for Russia, the economic and strategic dividends they accrue from these alignments are not equal. This could potentially create subtle strains or differing priorities within the broader anti-Western bloc, even if their core strategic partnership remains intact. The intricate dance of alliances among Iran, North Korea, and Russia would be a fascinating area for further study.

Recent Developments and International Scrutiny

The North Korea-Iran relationship continues to be a dynamic and closely watched phenomenon, with recent events underscoring its ongoing significance. The United States and the European Union have explicitly stated they are keeping their eyes on Pyongyang and Tehran for any possible military cooperation between the two, especially as Iran confirms a North Korean delegation's visit. This heightened vigilance is a direct response to the perceived threats posed by their collaboration, particularly in the context of global instability. The visit of Pyongyang's delegation, led by Yun Jung Ho, North Korea’s Minister of External Economic Relations, who flew out Tuesday for the trip to Iran, as reported by the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on Wednesday, signals a renewed push for engagement.

Beyond direct bilateral visits, North Korea has also demonstrated its alignment with Iran on specific geopolitical issues. On June 19, 2025, Pyongyang issued a strong rebuke of Israel’s recent military actions against Iran, characterizing the strikes as a grave breach of international law and a threat to global stability. The statement, released by North Korea’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, signals growing international concern over the rapidly escalating tensions in the Middle East and highlights North Korea’s willingness to publicly support Iran in contentious regional conflicts. This public stance reinforces the perception of a deeply intertwined relationship, extending beyond mere arms deals to include political solidarity on the international stage.

Diplomatic Engagements and Heightened Vigilance

The recent high-level delegation from North Korea to Iran, confirmed by both sides, is a clear indicator of the continued importance of their bilateral ties. Such visits are often used to solidify existing agreements, explore new avenues of cooperation, and coordinate strategies on international issues. For the international community, particularly the U.S. and E.U., these engagements are red flags, prompting increased intelligence gathering and diplomatic pressure.

The focus of this vigilance is not just on military hardware but also on financial transactions that could circumvent sanctions, and the sharing of sensitive technologies. Every confirmed meeting, every public statement of support, adds another piece to the puzzle of understanding the full scope of North Korea-Iran relations. The ongoing scrutiny reflects the global concern that any deepening of this partnership could further destabilize already volatile regions and complicate efforts to address nuclear proliferation and regional conflicts.

The Paradoxical Alliance: Opposites Yet Aligned

One of the most fascinating aspects of North Korea-Iran relations is the paradoxical nature of their alliance. While regarded in the West as two of the world’s most dangerous renegade states, they are in many ways polar opposites internally. The former is an Islamic Republic, founded on religious principles and governed by a clerical leadership, with a society deeply intertwined with Shia Islam. The latter is an irreligious state that worships Kim family rule above all else, operating under a totalitarian ideology of Juche, which emphasizes self-reliance and the absolute authority of the leader, with no official state religion.

Yet, for more than four decades, Pyongyang and Tehran have maintained a robust and strategic partnership. This enduring cooperation, despite their profound ideological differences, highlights the primacy of shared strategic interests over internal political or religious systems. Their common thread is a deep-seated opposition to the existing international order, particularly as defined and led by the United States and its allies. This shared external adversary provides a powerful unifying force, allowing them to overlook their internal disparities and focus on mutual objectives, such as circumventing sanctions, developing advanced military capabilities, and challenging Western hegemony. This unique dynamic makes their alliance particularly resilient and unpredictable, continuing to be a focal point of international concern.

Future Trajectories: What Lies Ahead for Pyongyang and Tehran?

The future of North Korea-Iran relations remains a critical area of observation for global security analysts. Given their entrenched opposition to Western powers, their shared pursuit of advanced military capabilities, and their proven track record of clandestine cooperation, it is highly probable that this strategic partnership will continue to evolve and deepen. While both states are aligned in their opposition to the West, and have much to gain from mutual support, the specific forms of their collaboration may shift in response to changing geopolitical realities and technological advancements.

The ongoing war in Ukraine, Russia's deepening ties with both nations, and the persistent tensions in the Middle East and East Asia all provide fertile ground for their alliance to strengthen. Whether this will manifest in more overt military cooperation, intensified nuclear and missile technology exchanges, or a more coordinated diplomatic front against international pressure, remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the North Korea-Iran axis will continue to be a significant factor in global security, demanding constant vigilance and strategic responses from the international community. Their relationship is not a relic of the past but a living, adapting alliance with profound implications for the future.

Conclusion

The strategic partnership between North Korea and Iran is a complex and enduring phenomenon, rooted in shared adversarial interests and decades of clandestine cooperation. From the early days of arms transfers during the Iran-Iraq War to contemporary concerns over nuclear proliferation and military technology exchanges, their relationship has consistently posed challenges to global security. Despite their profound ideological differences, their mutual opposition to Western powers has forged a bond that continues to be a focal point of international scrutiny.

Understanding the nuances of North Korea-Iran relations is essential for comprehending the broader geopolitical landscape. As both nations continue to pursue their strategic objectives, often in defiance of international norms, their alliance will undoubtedly remain a critical factor in shaping regional stability and global non-proliferation efforts. We encourage you to share your thoughts on this complex topic in the comments below. What are your biggest concerns regarding this alliance? And if you found this article insightful, please consider sharing it with others who might benefit from this in-depth analysis. Explore our other articles for more insights into critical international relations and security issues.

Biden Korea trip: North Korea and China relations pose challenge for U

Iran Could Outsource Its Nuclear-Weapons Program to North Korea - WSJ

[February 15, 2019] “The Iran Deal and North Korea” – GW Institute for

Gossip Pulse